Nickolas KolaCase study 03 / 05

Digital Democracy

A mountain of California political data, distilled into screens people can navigate.

  • Information architecture
  • Data visualisation
  • Competitive analysis
  • Wireframes

CalMatters, via 10up LLC · UX Lead · 6 interwoven data categories · A handful of weeks

Digital Democracy home page: a hero with a database search box over bold yellow, orange and blue shapes, and California Agenda topics below
  • 6interwoven categories decoded from a massive database into the IA
  • 3competitor platforms put through competitive and heuristic evaluation
  • 60%of total effort slated for design, so wireframes stayed lower fidelity

01 · The brief

Track a state, simply.

CalMatters, a nonprofit covering California politics, wanted a user-friendly platform to track the state’s vast, ever-changing political data. As UX lead I distilled it into manageable pieces.

The data covered people (politicians and the public), committees, hearings, bills, organisations and financial details. I designed screens for all of those data points. This was ultimately a data visualisation project.

Business goals

  • Promote accountability in state politics
  • Empower journalists with data access
  • Increase public engagement with governance

User needs

  • Access real-time political updates
  • Understand data without expertise
  • Find relevant info quickly

02 · Strategy

Divide and conquer.

There was a mountain of work, especially the data, and only a handful of weeks. I front-loaded my hours on discovery, research and IA so the design work could move quickly.

Discovery meant workshops for insights, stakeholder interviews and defining the project scope early.

03 · Research

Three competitors, closely read.

Desk research was the main method because of time limits. I ran competitive and heuristic evaluations on three competitor platforms.

The findings drove the design decisions that followed: benchmarking rival data layouts, identifying usability strengths and flaws, and shaping the IA. Research also covered the site’s data trends.

Competitive analysisHome and listing pages, annotated

04 · Information architecture

Six categories, one web.

I decoded the massive database into an IA of six interwoven categories, with the data linked so navigation stays seamless.

05 · Wireframes

Wireframes, reviewed as they landed.

Design was slated as 60% of total effort, so I kept to lower fidelity wireframes and reviewed each screen as it landed.

I created versions of each screen based on the insights from discovery, research and IA. When a screen was done it went straight to the stakeholder team for feedback, which kept the work efficient and moving with no down-time.

  • Home
  • Listing
  • Politician
HomeLower fidelity wireframe
Bills listingFilters and results
HearingVideo, agenda and transcript
Search resultsGrouped by type

06 · The result

The final screens.

After the design and redesigns, every wireframe was presented, and the UX came to life in the final screens.

The end result is, in my opinion, a masterpiece in data visualisation.

Legislature at a glanceFilters and a grid of legislators
HomeSearch, topics and legislators
BillStatus timeline and hearings
HearingVideo, agenda and transcript

07 · Final thoughts

A wonderful project to lead.

I am proud of this work. Making sense of this much data was something I never thought I was capable of, and with a rockstar team I am very happy with the outcome.

Digital Democracy

Contacts

Esc to close